<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile Usability Test: iReddit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intuitionhq.com/blog/2011/07/mobile-usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intuitionhq.com/blog/2011/07/mobile-usability/</link>
	<description>Website Usability Testing: IntuitionHQ.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 23:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green flute</title>
		<link>http://www.intuitionhq.com/blog/2011/07/mobile-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-1869</link>
		<dc:creator>Green flute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intuitionhq.com/blog/?p=798#comment-1869</guid>
		<description>Where do you post from???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do you post from???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_13th_dante</title>
		<link>http://www.intuitionhq.com/blog/2011/07/mobile-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>The_13th_dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intuitionhq.com/blog/?p=798#comment-551</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, no; it is restricting in the sense you can only share; not submit self reddit posts, such as questions, even more important than up voting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, no; it is restricting in the sense you can only share; not submit self reddit posts, such as questions, even more important than up voting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Creech</title>
		<link>http://www.intuitionhq.com/blog/2011/07/mobile-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Creech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intuitionhq.com/blog/?p=798#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for your comment. The numbers are based on my observations of a range of different usability tests over time, but once you have done some quick testing on your interfaces, you can quickly see what is or isn&#039;t working well. 
I&#039;ve seen interfaces (for example, Google and Bing) that have had average response times as low as 3.5 seconds, and other content heavy sites with results around 25 to 30 seconds. It rather depends on what sort of things you are testing, but one strategy that works well is finding a few sites to test as a benchmark in your own industry and seeing how you stack up. There are always improvements to be made, but you can get a quick idea of where you stand in comparison. 
I hope this helps; let me know if you&#039;d like me to explain in more detail. 
Cheers, Jacob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for your comment. The numbers are based on my observations of a range of different usability tests over time, but once you have done some quick testing on your interfaces, you can quickly see what is or isn&#8217;t working well.<br />
I&#8217;ve seen interfaces (for example, Google and Bing) that have had average response times as low as 3.5 seconds, and other content heavy sites with results around 25 to 30 seconds. It rather depends on what sort of things you are testing, but one strategy that works well is finding a few sites to test as a benchmark in your own industry and seeing how you stack up. There are always improvements to be made, but you can get a quick idea of where you stand in comparison.<br />
I hope this helps; let me know if you&#8217;d like me to explain in more detail.<br />
Cheers, Jacob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPall</title>
		<link>http://www.intuitionhq.com/blog/2011/07/mobile-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>JPall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intuitionhq.com/blog/?p=798#comment-535</guid>
		<description>This is great!


I was curious about where you are getting or how you&#039;ve developed your benchmarks such as &quot;For a simple interface like this, anything over 80% success rate, and an average click time of less than 10 seconds is very strong&quot; and how that is calculated into your eventual rating of 9.5/10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great!</p>
<p>I was curious about where you are getting or how you&#8217;ve developed your benchmarks such as &#8220;For a simple interface like this, anything over 80% success rate, and an average click time of less than 10 seconds is very strong&#8221; and how that is calculated into your eventual rating of 9.5/10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Usability Test: iReddit</title>
		<link>http://www.intuitionhq.com/blog/2011/07/mobile-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile Usability Test: iReddit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intuitionhq.com/blog/?p=798#comment-286</guid>
		<description>[...] thoughts on what we should test in the future, and to keep up with all the latest usability news.   &#160;  Related Posts:Satisfying The Cat and User Centered DesignUsability iPad App &#8211; 5 Promo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] thoughts on what we should test in the future, and to keep up with all the latest usability news.   &nbsp;  Related Posts:Satisfying The Cat and User Centered DesignUsability iPad App &#8211; 5 Promo [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.intuitionhq.com @ 2013-05-19 17:06:03 by W3 Total Cache -->